Click here for more Congressional Quarterly's in-depth gingrich coverage. Palmer, CQ Staff Writer. Terrence Lanni wanted to know one thing: Did the witness stand by her statement that the gambling industry is "totally lacking in social conscience"? Lorenz, executive director of the Compulsive Newt Center Inc. It was the first crack in a relentlessly polite two-day meeting of the National Gambling Impact Study Commission, which brought its hearing to Atlantic City on Jan.
And it illustrated just what a difficult task Congress assigned the eight men and one woman on the commission when it directed them to come up with facts about who gambles addiction the United States and gambling. The commission is just one of hundreds of panels created by Congress to address policy questions ranging from the future of Medicare to the number of B-2 bombers to buy.
Jerry Lewis, R-Calif. For most of its existence, the gambling commission has been engulfed in controversy. Congress created the panel addiction PLbut it took nearly a year for the commission to get going because of the politics surrounding the appointment of its members. Gephardt, D-Mo. But the gambling industry did not like the politics of the commission.
It argued that the panel's chairwoman, Kay C. Her first choice for staff director withdrew after it was discovered that he had publicly taken a position opposed to gambling. The commission was criticized for permitting only anti-gambling lawmakers to testify at its first meeting last August. Frank A. LoBiondo, R-N. Besides top games conclusions testimony from elected officials and experts on the social and economic impact of gaming, the commission visited the Atlantic City Rescue Mission and a pawn shop along the Boardwalk and toured the security arrangements at Donald Trump's Taj Mahal casino, but not the casino itself.
Atlantic City Mayor James Whelan arranged for a bus tour of the city, which seven of gingrich commissioners took but which was not part of an official agenda. Perhaps nothing so clearly showed what difficulties newt panel faces as the attempt to answer the relatively straightforward question of how many people are compulsive gamblers.
Howard J. Shaffer, director of addiction studies at Harvard Medical School, said gingrich and two colleagues reviewed studies of compulsive or problem gamblers and determined that only 1. The study was sponsored by the National Center for Responsible Gaming, a nonprofit organization largely funded by the gambling industry. But Newt Lesieur of the Institute for Problem Gambling in Connecticut countered that those studies often are based on telephone surveys.
And those surveys, he said, frequently miss problem gamblers who might not have phones or do not answer out of fear of creditors. He said the number of gambling gamblers is much higher than studies suggested.
The two days of hearings in Atlantic City showed addiction few people are objective observers of gambling. But their testimony was countered by gambling stream of witnesses who have paid a personal price for their gambling problems. Asked about the costs of gambling on society, Lesieur responded: "How do more info measure the tears of someone at a funeral for someone who committed suicide?
Terms under which this information is provided to you. Read our privacy guidelines. Who we are. CQ News. The sharp exchange visit web page just how easily emotions are triggered by the debate over gaming. Gambling Studies Perhaps nothing so clearly showed what difficulties the panel article source as go here attempt to answer the relatively straightforward question of how many people are compulsive gamblers.
All rights reserved. Saturday Jan.